At First, I Just Wanted to Learn the Flowers

We have a place in the Oregon Coast range. It has an east-west valley with a year-round creek, and north-and a south-facing slope on the sides. Some is in meadow, some is hardwood forest, and a lot is in conifers. There are a few vernal pools, rock outcrops on the ridges, and an old barnyard and former pasture. Most of the forest has been logged once, although there’s old-growth forest (never logged) beyond our ownership. It was first homesteaded in 1911 and has changed ownership at sixteen times; people out there had a hard time making a living. With all this history, I decided I wanted to learn the names, habitats, and first flowering dates of all the vascular plants in our valley and to photograph the flowers. I kept it simple by excluding graminoids (grasses, sedges, and rushes). I didn’t limit my forays to our property, but included the road leading in and the slopes to the east and west of us, to the extent we get up there to explore.

I started identifying plants and getting the first dates of flowering in 2011, the first full year we owned the place. In 2024, I decided to put the plants in order according to the earlies date I ever recorded a flower for them. That now serves as my checklist. That date isn’t representative of when I should start expecting to see flowers, but it does give me a way to organize the data. Here is the mosaic of the flowers of the natives from my 2024 photos, arranged in flowering order.

Overall, there are 167 native species (above) and another 86 naturalized ones. The naturalized ones include a lot weeds but also tree species, like some of the cherries, that are dispersed by birds. There are also 55 species that were planted. These include garden plants like the spring bulbs and shrubs, and also the orchard trees, rhododendrons, and other ornamentals that have been put in over the past 114 years. I have photos of all of these, by flowering date, on my @botanybarb instagram account. The natives are the only ones I finished a poster for.

The natives tended to start blooming earlier in the year than the naturalized species. The natives also tended to have more consistent dates for their first flowers each year, which makes sense; the naturalized ones made it here by being opportunistic, and that shows with their wide range of when they flower. And whereas I can find most of the natives every year, the naturalized ones come and go–which is nice; it means that weeds don’t necessarily move in and take hold forever.

Without this project, I doubt I would have noticed how the mustard family seem to bloom early and the composites late, or that the native bulbs don’t necessarily bloom early in the sring. Nor would I have noticed that the flowers (of natives, naturalized species, and planted ones, together) seem most colorful early in the season, then devolve to a very long series of species whose flowers are almost all white. That doesn’t show so much in the montage of native above though. Still, I decided to take a petal from each of the flowers in the poster , blow it up, and see if there was a strong trend in flower color. But as I did the project, I learned what artists surely know, that the colors I was blowing up aren’t true. often white flowers turned out looking pale aqua, and orange ones had pink tinges I don’t think were there in nature. My photography, done with my i-phone, doesn’t capture true colors, and the petals I enlarged for the next poster were heavily influenced by shadows. I don’t see any pattern in these natives, but they are pretty.

I stopped recording first flowering dates in 2025. I knew I wouldn’t be at the cabin regularly this years, so dates would be misleading. I’m still using the data as a checklist, though.

I’ve had some other big surprises. One was that after we clearcut about 20 acres, some natives appeared that we hadn’t seen before, including Oregon sunshine (Eriophyllum lanatum), lanceleaf figwort (Scrophularia lanceolata), and sleepy catchfly (Silene antirhhina). This was the first time the catchfly had been documented in our county. It’s not rare, and the habitat is right, but that was still a surprise.

Another clearcut surprise was the incredible diversity of species–mostly native–that appeared after the harvests. On aclimb from bottom to top I can easily see thirty native species, from common things like Berberis/Mahonia to plants I usually only see in a few patches, like understory composites, tigerlilies, and Pyrola.

I was surprised by the distinct waves of naturalized species (weeds) that came in after the clearcutting. For the first 2 years, there was almost 100% cover of Senecio sylvatica in places, but in year 3 and afterward it was rare. On top of that, I discovered that late in the season, entire branches of it had a very different floral architecture; some of my colleagues surmise it may be influenced by a wasp laying eggs in the stem. Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea), a cudweed called Euchiton, and a native called Navarretia (that smells like skunks) became very common in many places in year 2 and year 3 but then subsided.

Another surprise was that–not surprisingly, really–some of our natives have weedy aspects. We have native thistles, for example, that behave like other thistles. We can’t blame all our weeds on Eurasia! Another surprise was that when our natives were blooming, quite often congeners (species of the same genus) would be blooming almost the exact same day in other countries around the globe. Yet another surprise came from correspondence on Instagram with a botanist in Ireland who told me that many of the European invasives (weeds) here in the states are actually endangered in Europe now. They used to inhabit hedgerows (strips between cultivated plots), but with different agriculture and weed management now, they are rare. And one in particular that has an exploding population in Oregon now, called Geranium lucidum (shining geranium) only lives in a quite a restricted area in Ireland, and only on certain soils. Thus, strangely, the “New World” has become a refugium for some of the species Eurasia is losing.

Another surprise for me was that I got to know each plant by looking so hard for it in all seasons and trying to take its photo with the dogs wanting to roll on them, light shifting, my body sliding down the slope, or me clinging to a branch trying not to fall. While walking one day, I tried to decide what species out there had the very most amazing features, and before long, I realized every single one has amazing, endearing traits: huge leaves (can only live in wet places), backward hairs on undersides of leaves (helps them stay on top of leaves of competition), wirelike stalks on the flowers with a little twist in it, furry leaves in the buds with no bud scales (called naked buds), speckled fruits, frog-foot-shaped foliage, seed pods that bend down on maturity and burry themselves, horridly scarry spiny floral throats, three-forked hairs on leaves, sticky rings on the stalks that would keep climbing bugs from getting the flowers and seeds, tendrils that look like springs until you look closely and realize that if they rotate twenty times to the left, they have to also rotate twenty times to the right so there’s a spot in the middle without rotation, like an old kinked phone line. And so one. Every single plant had something amazing about it. I’d love to go on and on–308 times–because it is absolutely amazing. Bristles that shine like bronze, flowers that dangle and look like pieces of sky.

And I also learned that weeds have names. That until I decided to learn 100% of the plants, I’d simply blown past them. That is the best case of implicit bias I can relate to.

And then the fact that names and relationships are changing quickly these days. I use the Oregon Flora Project for my definitive names. Molecular genetics have shown relationships that hadn’t been certain before (like that a lot of figworts and the plantains are closely related), and in other cases, that plants that look similar are actually distinct.

What started wth my dreamy idea to know what was growing at our isolated place out in the woods is opening worlds to me.

6 thoughts on “At First, I Just Wanted to Learn the Flowers

Add yours

  1. it’s wonderful to read this Barb your love for every single plant is what love is. Wonderful to ponder you too. BJ

    Like

  2. Very inspiring article, Barb! Thanks for sharing. It makes me want to redouble my efforts to learn my local plants. Do you post your observations to iNaturalist?

    Mike

    Like

  3. Thank you, Barbara, for sharing this loving look into your world! What do you mean by “weedy aspect”? Aren’t weeds simply plants growing where you wish they didn’t?

    Like

  4. Hi, Barb, I love your essay on the flowers around the cabin in Lobster Valley. Have you considered publishing this? I don’t know if the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon still exists (Kalmiopsis?) but at the least it could go in the NPSO newsletter. Joyce Eberhart or Dan Luoma might know about this. And, I’m so glad you are having time to enjoy your property and write up observations and thoughts such as this one.  Thank you for sending this to me. Amy Amy Rossman 1808 NW Sunview Dr. Corvallis, OR 97330

    Like

Leave a reply to Amy Rossman Cancel reply

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑